The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has alleged that three sets of questions concerning its youth led protest were disallowed during the recent Monsoon Session of Parliament, with the party questioning the ground cited for their rejection.
CJP chief spokesperson Saurav Das raised the issue on Sunday, August 17, 2026, saying the question were rejected on the basis of parliamentary admissibility condition. He criticised the decision and argued that questions concerning the protests should have been allowed to come before the House.
Questions Submitted by DMK MP
According to Das, Lok Sabha MP Matheswaran V.S. of the DMK had sought answers from both the Union Home Ministry and the Union Education Ministry through three sets of question.
The question reportedly carried notice reference numbers 101799 and 101801. However, the questions did not proceed in the House after being deemed inadmissible under the applicable parliamentary condition, according to the CJP account.
CJP Questions the Decision
Reacting to the development in a post on X, Das criticised the decision to disallow the question. The party objection centres on whether parliamentary admissibility rules were applied appropriately in this particular case.
For the CJP, the episode is significant because the questions reportedly concerned protests involving young people and issues related to education and government action.
What Does Inadmissible Mean?
Question submitted by MPs in Parliament are subject to procedural requirement before they can be admitted for an answer. Not every question submitted by a member is automatically accepted for inclusion in parliamentary proceeding.
A question can therefore be rejected or disallowed if it does not meet the relevant admissibility requirements. The fact that a question was not admitted does not, by itself, establish that the government prevented a particular issue from being discussed.
Political Debate Continues
The controversy comes amid continuing political disagreement over youth protests, examination related issues and the government's handling of student grievances.
The CJP criticism presents the rejected question as a matter of concern, while the parliamentary admissibility process provides the procedural context for the decision. The precise reasons for rejecting each question would be necessary to independently assess whether the party criticism is justified.
Key Takeaway
CJP spokesperson Saurav Das said three sets of questions linked to the party youth protest were disallowed in the Lok Sabha on admissibility ground. The controversy now centres on the specific parliamentary rules applied to the questions and whether their rejection was a routine procedural decision or warrants further political scrutiny.